Modena, amore mio.

Presentaz.di Roberto Pinza. Modena, Banco di S.Gimignano e Prospero s.d.(anni '90), cm.25,5x31, pp.141, oltre 100 tavv.a col.alcune a doppia pag.n legatura ed. sopracop.fig.a col.

Con commenti scritti dai fiorentini:U.Baldini,C.Cassola, D.Giampieri,M.Luzi,A.Parronchi. Modena, Artioli Ed. 1976, cm.26x31, pp.137, num.fig.a col.nt. legatura ed.,soprac.fig.a col.

Fotografie di Beppe Zagaglia e Maurizio Manzotti. Testo di Graziano Manni. Modena, Artioli Editore per Cassa di Risparmio di Carpi 1983, cm.26x31, pp.139,(5), numerose tavv. fotogr. a col.nt., legatura ed.cartonata, titoli al dorso, sopraccop.fig. a colori. [copia in ottimo stato.]

Commenti scritti dai bolognesi:Enzo Biagi,Franco Cristofori, Bruno Lanzarini,Gianni Raimondi,Dino Sarti. Modena, Artioli Ed. 1983, cm.25,5x30,5, pp.144, num.figg.a col.nt. legatura ed.in tutta tela,sopracop.fig.a col.

A cura di L.Pacini Savoj, M.B.Luporini. Firenze, Sansoni 1961, completo in 4 voll. cm.14x20,5, pp.XXIII-2390,1391,XIV-1103, legature editoriali in t.pelle, titolie fregi in oro ai dorsi.

Albany, State University of New York 1995, cm.14,7x23, pp.X,278,(6), brossura, cop.fig.a col. (copia non letta e in stato eccellente.) Coll. SUNY Series in Philosophy. This book shows that Maimonides and St. Thomas reached strikingly similar conclusions regarding the limits of reason and that these limits, in turn, show the dimensions of philosophical understanding. Through a comparative philosophical examination of the diverse aporiae constituting the question of providence, the author seeks to determine the degree of philosophical compatibility between Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas, and where disagreement is evident, its origin, nature and philosophical consequences. Dobbs-Weinstein retrieves some occluded aspects of their thought that render a better understanding of each thinker and provide a richer philosophical vocabulary for discussions of the limits of reason, the consequent inevitable limits of language and interpretation and, above all, the relation between knowing and acting. This study also shows how and why, despite the fact that they adopt some radically different ontological principles, Maimonides and Aquinas reach strikingly similar conclusions concerning the existential dimensions of human life, especially the possibilities and modes of knowledge and the actions consequent upon them.

Note a cura di Maria Bianca Luporini. Firenze, Sansoni Ed. 1961, cm.13,5x21, pp.1260-2394, legatura editoriale in tutta pelle.